Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

为什么AI很难发现新药?

上一代初创企业未能兑现当时的夸张宣传。企业高管如今押注更强大的AI工具将攻克人体生物学的复杂难点。

现代汽车:卷入美国移民突袭风暴的车企

这家试图助力美国制造业发展的韩国企业,正面临特朗普加征的更高关税,并在韩国国内面临罢工。

欧洲对德拉吉方案推进缓慢

意大利前总理德拉吉发布竞争力报告一年后,欧盟仅落实了其想法的11.2%。

瑞穗CEO:瑞穗具备跻身全球前十投行的“所有要素”

在完成对格林希尔的整合后,这家日本集团已准备好在美国市场迎战美国竞争对手。

SpaceX巧妙闯入投资者“轨道”

EchoStar从濒临破产,摇身一变成为押注全球最大“独角兽”的间接途径。

石油巨头因油价低迷大幅削减工作岗位与投资

石油业高管们准备迎接可能将持续多年的低迷期。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×