AI start-up Anthropic settles landmark copyright suit for $1.5bn - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

AI start-up Anthropic settles landmark copyright suit for $1.5bn

Case will compensate authors but could raise costs of training large language models

AI start-up Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5bn to settle a copyright lawsuit over its use of pirated texts, setting a precedent for tech companies facing intellectual property cases from authors and publishers.

The settlement, which must be approved by the San Francisco federal judge overseeing the case, would be “the largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history”, according to a court filing on Friday.

The class action suit was brought by authors who claimed Anthropic had downloaded 465,000 books and other texts from “pirated websites” including Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror, which it then used to train its large language models.

Failure to reach an agreement would have led to a trial, with the prospect of damages of up to $1tn. That would have bankrupted Anthropic, a four-year-old start-up backed by Amazon and Google that was recently valued at $170bn.

The case is among several facing artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI and Meta, alleging they have improperly used copyrighted works to train their models.

The results will help determine how authors are compensated for the use of their works and could have significant ramifications for how AI companies train their models and the costs of developing them.

Mary Rasenberger, chief executive of the Authors Guild, said Friday’s settlement sent a “strong message to the AI industry that there are serious consequences when they pirate authors’ works to train their AI, robbing those least able to afford it”.

Anthropic and other AI companies have claimed that training models on copyrighted books is fair use, arguing that their models transform the original work into something with a new meaning.

In June, the California district court ruled that Anthropic’s use of some copyrighted works in such a way was fair. But it determined that storing pirated works was “inherently, irredeemably infringing”, teeing up Friday’s settlement.

Friday’s ruling also means Anthropic will have to destroy the datasets it had downloaded from Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror.

“In June, the district court issued a landmark ruling on AI development and copyright law, finding that Anthropic’s approach to training AI models constitutes fair use. Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims,” said Anthropic’s deputy general counsel Aparna Sridhar in a statement.

“We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organisations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery and solve complex problems,” she added.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

利伯特如何成为汇丰的临时主席

一场混乱的、历时七个月的搜寻过程,起初大范围物色外部人选,最终却回到了杜嘉祺的临时接任者身上。

为人工智能热潮寻铜

建设数据中心和绿色电网导致铜需求旺盛,但铜供应紧张,新发现的铜矿项目也屈指可数。

为AI编程“抓虫”的初创企业获得投资者青睐

随着AI生成软件的激增,简街集团领投了测试公司Antithesis的1.05亿美元融资。

科技行业内部加速采用人工智能

企业先在自己内部试用最新人工智能工具,以便向潜在客户展示其潜力。

学生热情拥抱人工智能,学校却持谨慎态度

出于对作弊及对人工智能削弱批判性思考的担忧,教育机构正采取更为谨慎的做法。

下一款重磅药会来自中国吗?

在创纪录投资和供应链改善的推动下,中国生物制药行业正在蓬勃发展。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×